Mark Ridley-Thomas and Crony, Alex Johnson: An Insidious Virus Within the Black Community
.
 |
| Mark Ridley-Thomas, Alex Johnson |
.
Subsequent to the sudden and untimely passing of longtime LAUSD board member, Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte, a large coalition of parents, clergy, politicians, local activists, and groups within the education community came together to support the interim appointment of George McKenna to complete Ms. LaMotte’s term of office. That’s how such matters have been routinely handled in the past.
.
McKenna is a lifelong educator with an illustrious background, a proven track record, and is highly respected - in fact, he is esteemed - within the educational community. He became nationally renowned after being portrayed by Denzel Washington in the movie, "Hard Lessons," chronicling McKenna’s stunning turnaround of George Washington Preparatory High School in South Central Los Angeles. McKenna enjoys the endorsement of the Democratic Party, the United Teachers Los Angeles, the LA Times, La Opinión, LA Sentinel and over 100 leaders in the education, ecumenical, political, civic community, and now, 4 of 5 of his former June 3rd opponents.
.
Yet, in spite of all of the support that George McKenna enjoys from within the community, and in spite of the fact that there's a regular election scheduled for March 3rd of next year and by forcing a SPECIAL election the community was left without representation for months and it costs the district over $2.5 million that could have been used to educate our young people, Mark Ridley-Thomas completely ignored all of that and used all of the political influence that he could muster to force a special election. So why did he thumb his nose at what was clearly in the best interest of the community? It's simple - so he could deny George McKenna the advantage of incumbency and promote the candidacy of a political crony, Alex Johnson, one of his deputies on educational affairs.
.
It was a clear case of giving the political consolidation of power priority over the best interest of the people. Again, it was a blatant act of cronyism - or to be more specific, an act of promoting friends and associates to positions of authority without proper regard for their qualifications, or lack thereof, in direct opposition to the interest of the people. So let this be a teaching moment - White folks don't corner the market on undermining the Black community for political gain. It is very important that we learn that lesson as a community.
.
But of course, Johnson/Thomas supporters might ask, how do we know that Supervisor Ridley-Thomas doesn’t simply feel that Alex Johnson is the better man?
.
That’s a very simple question to answer - the tone of the Johnson/Thomas campaign. Whenever you have a candidate whose primary concern is to better the plight and conditions of the people, that’s what their campaign will focus upon. Such a politician will generally come to the people with an agenda, tell the people what he or she hopes to accomplish, and then begin to explain why they think they’re the better candidate. But that certainly doesn’t describe the Johnson/Thomas campaign. They came out slinging mud and feces everywhere.
.
Alex Johnson and Ridley-Thomas have taken a page right of the Republican play book. They’re using the EXACT same tactics against George McKenna as the GOP has been using against President Obama - "never mind what's in the best interest of the people; what's right is what's best for me" - and that fact alone should tell us that these two individuals, and ALL politicians of their ilk, are bad news for the Black community.
.
Yes, this is a story local to Los Angeles, but it has national implications. It is incumbent upon the Black community to get rid of these kind of political buzzards all across the country. If we fail to do so, we're literally VOTING for second-class citizenship. We have enough on our plate without having to fight to get a fair shake and justice from our "own."
.
These people have no sense of integrity. Just like the GOP, they hope to benefit from anger, animosity, and turmoil rather than competence and integrity. That accounts for why they're slinging mud instead of an agenda, because they clearly don’t have a viable agenda to present.
.
They don’t want that seat because they want to help the people. They couldn’t care less about the people. They want that office - or ANY office - because it helps to consolidate the PERSONAL political power of Mark Ridley-Thomas. Period.
.
Ridley-Thomas’ behavior seems to indicate that he sees himself as the big city version of "Boss Hog"(no pun intended) - and this sort of thing has been going on for quite some time with him. In the 2010 article, "L.A. County supervisor gives his side of the story," that appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Steve Lopez writes:
.
"L.A. County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas greeted me warmly Monday afternoon, even though I'd come to hear him explain why he used $25,000 in taxpayer money to buy a place in 'Who's Who in Black Los Angeles.' I wanted to ask him whether his decision to buy the spread had anything to do with the fact that the book's associate publisher has made campaign donations to the supervisor and is a longtime ally. But first Ridley-Thomas wanted to give me a tour of his office, which he had intended to refurbish at a cost of $707,000 — until the project made the news . . ."
.
In the same article, Lopez gives Ridley-Thomas’ explanation as to why he paid $25,000 of the taxpayer’s money to be featured in 'Who’s Who in Black Los Angeles':
.
" Ridley-Thomas told me it was worth honoring those county employees because many in the African American community ‘don't know’ there are black people ‘in positions of leadership’ in the county. I thought he must be kidding, but he said he wasn't. I suggested that it might be cheaper to use his newsletter to break the news, rather than 'Who's Who,' especially since I don't think anybody's buying the book unless they're featured in it.
.
"I wasn't all that surprised to learn that the associate publisher of 'Who's Who,' Anthony Samad, happens to be a longtime friend of Ridley-Thomas. But I was a little rattled to discover when I looked up campaign contributions that Samad donated $1,250 to Ridley-Thomas' campaign in 2007 and 2008. And that's not all. I also laid my hands on a document showing that Samad had been awarded a $24,999 consulting contract in 2002 by the city of Los Angeles, at the behest of then-Councilman Ridley-Thomas."
.
Now, I suppose if one is a logical contortionist, one could say that by funneling that money to Anthony Samad, it COULD be considered funneling it back into the community. But I’m not a contortionist, so it looks to me like cronyism - especially considering the fact that Samad is one of Ridley-Thomas’ longtime friends and political contributors. But I’m not going to past judgment on whether this kind of palm-greasing is improper or not. While it looks highly suspect to me, I’m going to leave it to the readers to make that determination for themselves.
.
But it does make one thing irrefutably clear, however - Mark Ridley-Thomas feels absolutely no reluctance in using his office to promote his own interest and benefit friends, and that’s exactly what he’s doing in this race for District 1 of the LAUSD. But this time it's a little different from greasing a friend’s palm. This time around, by supporting his friend, the eminently inexperienced Alex Johnson over the renowned George McKenna, he’s clearly demonstrating that his loyalty to self, friends, and cronies is given a much higher priority than you and your children, and that represents a fatal flaw in a politician.
.
So the bottom line is this - with all the adversity that we're already forced to face in the Black community, can we afford to also have politicians in office who place their needs before our own? I don't think so - and we need to keep that thought in mind, not only in the coming election, but also, when Mark Ridley-Thomas himself faces the voters again.
.
When a politician becomes so comfortable in his position that he begins to think that HE'S more important than the people, it's time to get rid of him.
.
.
Eric L. Wattree
Citizens Against Reckless Middle-Class Abuse (CARMA) .
Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.